Nigga lovers

[Mr C0ff33]

also if they expect to live in this counrty they should at least respect the multi cultural attitude we have. Instead of criticising it.. i.e muslim is the way any thing else is the devil... that kind of thing. We have the decency to respect theirs (most of the time). As for france... bollocks to em! I daren't get started on them... he he [img]smile.gif[/img]

[pennyweighter]

I dont think we should let them in, valid reasons or not.
Saying that the BNP gained 2 saets the other month didnt they? How do we feel about the slow rise in power of the facsist and racsist regimes?

[Boggy]

So the UK can't support all these "scroungers" then?

aren't "we" the 4th richest nation in the world or something?

and don't "we" spend money on utter bollocks (millenium dome, the military, arse licking etc.) when this money could be supporting the third world in the first place?

The way i see it is that most of these countries where these people are seeking asylum from have been fucked about for too long by the Western world (not just Britain). This is just one way of taking some form of responsibilty. The other is by helping + funding them and not bombing them, makes sense when you think about it.

I'm actually quite happy about what the government is doing right now. Yes we are more leniant towards asylum claims than most other countries in the west, and hopefully other countries will follow on in due course (Germany, France, maybe even Australia (unlikely). 'Course i'm living in my imaginary world here but we've all got to have an ideal.

And i also agree about having a sense of humour. A way of dealing with racism is by ridiculing the shite that is said.

[SkimmedMilk]

the man tells the truth. go boggy.

[Sheriff John Bunell]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by robo-plegic wrong cock:
This is reflected through rising taxes.
it is VERY hard to get into countries such as Australia or America, they have very strict laws</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

Not having a go but;

Taxes will always rise, especially with the NHS and Eductaion the way they are.

It's probably just as hard to get into the UK as it is to those other countries, but they don't have a ruddy great tunnel under the sea.

[DJ-Ants]

send all the gingers back to Fucking Scotland...then nuke it...

[the Xprincess]

I don’t agree with any system that deducts money from a worker who is forced to pay extortionately high taxes in order to pay for those who CHOOSE not to work, where’s the justice in that? So in that case no I don’t agree with these asylum seekers who come over here and don’t work (and the majority don’t).
They get housed, benefits access to education etc and all at the tax payers expense and sorry Boggy but I would rather pay millions of pounds on some dingy dome than on someone who wants to come over here and take advantage of the system. As goes for the British citizen really, those who CHOOSE not to work are effectively living off others making them vermin; October 2002 a staggering 872,855 people are unemployed in Britain!!!

IF the British government really wanted to help asylum seekers they would invest money into the countries that we are receiving immigrants from so we could try helping the country back into financial / political / social / economical stability therefore helping the people in these countries and giving them better quality of life. But no this would do nothing to help the British economy which is what this is all about; rather than putting money into something which is no investment (other countries economy) the government instead allow asylum seekers in they give them homes clothes money. Even the asylum seekers that work are a bigger bonus because the government gain even more taxes from them.

At the end of the day the money all goes back into OUR economy the money us working citizens pay out in taxes goes to the asylum seekers which then spend OUR money on food and clothes (that are taxed by the government) and therefore heading straight back to the government back pockets. This is Britain’s way of saying we help asylum seekers, but they don’t they encourage it as they gain recognition for helping asylum seekers when really it just increases our gain and the asylum seekers countries loss of the young/ middle age working men also the future of their country and we take them only to give them the low paid jobs as many will do the jobs no native will do and effectively use them as a slave culture.

Yet the people of Afghanistan and all them other countries we accept immigrants from are left over there to live in conditions of poverty and war because our government want to keep it “ ??? in the country” by..
Taxing the Population to Benefit Corporations
Channelling Taxpayers' Moneys into Private Profits
Exporting Employment (Importing Unemployment) at Taxpayers' Expense
[u]Here are some facts(/u)
The UK received 97,200 asylum applications in 2000, 22 percent of the European total… will these people have jobs when they arrive.. NO!
The budget for caring for asylum seekers in the UK is expected to top L1.5 billion in 2003, up from L1 billion in 2002; local authorities will be able to spend up to L450 a week to provide housing, food and clothing for an asylum seeker and his family
There are about 28 million employed workers in the UK, and 234,000 vacant jobs. There are 7.7 million people of working age not working, including 5.4 million who say they do not want a job (http://www.dfee.gov.uk/)

[fozz]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by DJ-Ants:
send all the gingers back to Fucking Scotland...then nuke it...</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

not read what came b4 and cant be arsed anyway, but gingers were mentioned and i dunno if anyone else notcied but gingers and niggers are anagrams of each other so god designed it that way so that both can be disliked by many in a none racist way [img]tongue.gif[/img]

[SkimmedMilk]

if the money that western governments spent on weapons of mass destruction and funding terrorist groups had been put to use helping the economy and inferstructure of develeping nations we would not have the 'problem' of asylum seekers.

Ask yourself this, how long has your family been in England? Its not for ever so dont go on about 'our country'.

[Lost Child]

does anyone on here actually know enough about this to pass any comment that is reliable and worth listening to?

i know i don't.
it just seems like a lot of ideology, and getting facts of a government-run website doesn't really help at all: all GDP, unemployment, GNP, income distribution percentiles etc etc etc are twisted/altered anyway.